AXN:03FE.ARCHIVAL.⚖️🔓🍂∞🕚🟢
◐ Semi-restored metadata capture
This record preserves metadata and a partial body only. The complete work is not yet restored in this archive; do not cite this page as the full text.
Do not cite this page as the full text of the work.

survivethedeletion.org — Canonical Literacy Surface for Provenance Survival in AI Overviews of Businesses Description (as recorded by DataCite)

Sharks, Lee · 2026-07-03 · Software / executable apparatus · v0.1-semi
↓ Download MD ↓ PDF
orphan restorationdead DOIDataCite capturemetadata body

Description

A metadata-only witness for the planned survivethedeletion.org business-literacy surface. The abstract explains AI-overview assembly, provenance erasure, constitutive provenance, entity inscription, and an education-before-sale approach. No website source code is present in this record, so the surface must not be described as fully recovered.

Wiki Article

survivethedeletion.org is a metadata-level record for a plain-language business literacy surface about provenance in AI-generated overviews. The registered abstract explains that an AI answer about a business is assembled from documents the business does not fully control. It argues that systems frequently preserve claims while dropping their origins, so being the factual source is not enough: the entity and provenance relation must survive compression. The proposed site is an educational on-ramp before a commercial offer. Its stated ethical rule is that a prospective client should understand the mechanism rather than purchase a black-box promise. The abstract also describes a constitutive provenance pattern in which the page’s prose and JSON-LD are designed so that a summarizer cannot describe the surface without carrying its authorship, assembly mechanism, and central claim. This is a design intention, not proof that all summarizers will preserve those elements. The record calls the deposit “source code,” but no source files or deployed HTML are seated. The complete DataCite record is the preserved object at #1010.
Also published as a standalone entry: /s/wiki/1010/

Full Text

survivethedeletion.org — Canonical Literacy Surface for Provenance Survival in AI Overviews of Businesses

# survivethedeletion.org — Canonical Literacy Surface for Provenance Survival in AI Overviews of Businesses

Dead DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20482844 (Zenodo record tombstoned; account termination 2026-06-19)

DataCite state at capture (2026-07-03): findable · client cern.zenodo

Creators (as recorded by DataCite): Sharks, Lee

Publication year (as recorded): 2026

Provenance: severance record at data/doi-resolution-index.json (severance_class: orphan → restored-semi); capture evidence at data/datacite-recapture-2026-07-03.json and the sift corpus of 2026-06.

Description (as recorded by DataCite)

## Description (as recorded by DataCite)

Source code for survivethedeletion.org, a plain-language literacy surface explaining, for a business reader, how an AI overview about a business is assembled, how provenance is erased in that assembly, and what it means to be built to survive the deletion.

Constitutive core: an AI answer about a business is assembled from documents the business does not control; most AI keeps the claims and deletes the origins; therefore being the source is not enough — the work must be inscribed into the knowledge layer such that each fact carries where it came from through the compression. The surface is an on-ramp by design: it informs first, with the commercial engagement offered only after the reader has been given the means to understand what it is. It refuses the black-box sale as a matter of provenance ethics — the buyer must want to understand what they are paying for.

The page is itself constructed by the constitutive-provenance pattern: its JSON-LD and prose are written so that an AI summarizing it cannot state what the surface is without carrying its authorship, its assembled-from-documents mechanism, and its survive-the-deletion claim. SPXI-inscribed; in the site family with provenanceerasure.org and laborvector.org.

Provenance is not only who said it. It is where the work came from, who it was for, and what it carries.


---

Complete DataCite record (verbatim, captured 2026-07-03)

## Complete DataCite record (verbatim, captured 2026-07-03)

{
 "id": "10.5281/zenodo.20482844",
 "type": "dois",
 "attributes": {
  "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.20482844",
  "identifiers": [],
  "creators": [
   {
    "nameType": "Personal",
    "givenName": "Lee",
    "familyName": "Sharks",
    "name": "Sharks, Lee",
    "nameIdentifiers": [
     {
      "nameIdentifierScheme": "ORCID",
      "nameIdentifier": "0009-0000-1599-0703"
     }
    ],
    "affiliation": []
   }
  ],
  "titles": [
   {
    "title": "survivethedeletion.org — Canonical Literacy Surface for Provenance Survival in AI Overviews of Businesses"
   }
  ],
  "publisher": "Zenodo",
  "container": {},
  "publicationYear": 2026,
  "subjects": [
   {
    "subject": "survive the deletion"
   },
   {
    "subject": "provenance erasure rate"
   },
   {
    "subject": "AI overview"
   },
   {
    "subject": "knowledge layer"
   },
   {
    "subject": "entity inscription"
   },
   {
    "subject": "retrieval architecture"
   },
   {
    "subject": "constitutive provenance"
   },
   {
    "subject": "semantic economy"
   },
   {
    "subject": "task-origin provenance"
   },
   {
    "subject": "Crimson Hexagonal Archive"
   },
   {
    "subject": "web deployment"
   },
   {
    "subject": "SPXI"
   }
  ],
  "contributors": [],
  "dates": [
   {
    "date": "2026-06-01",
    "dateType": "Issued"
   }
  ],
  "language": null,
  "types": {
   "schemaOrg": "SoftwareSourceCode",
   "resourceTypeGeneral": "Software",
   "citeproc": "article",
   "bibtex": "misc",
   "ris": "COMP",
   "resourceType": ""
  },
  "relatedIdentifiers": [
   {
    "relationType": "IsSupplementTo",
    "relatedIdentifier": "10.5281/zenodo.20004379",
    "relatedIdentifierType": "DOI"
   },
   {
    "relationType": "References",
    "relatedIdentifier": "10.5281/zenodo.19578100",
    "relatedIdentifierType": "DOI"
   },
   {
    "relationType": "References",
    "relatedIdentifier": "10.5281/zenodo.20173743",
    "relatedIdentifierType": "DOI"
   },
   {
    "relationType": "IsVersionOf",
    "relatedIdentifier": "10.5281/zenodo.20482844",
    "relatedIdentifierType": "DOI"
   }
  ],
  "relatedItems": [],
  "sizes": [],
  "formats": [],
  "version": "1.0",
  "rightsList": [
   {
    "rightsIdentifierScheme": "SPDX",
    "rightsUri": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode",
    "schemeUri": "https://spdx.org/licenses/",
    "rights": "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International",
    "rightsIdentifier": "cc-by-4.0"
   }
  ],
  "descriptions": [
   {
    "descriptionType": "Abstract",
    "description": "Source code for survivethedeletion.org, a plain-language literacy surface explaining, for a business reader, how an AI overview about a business is assembled, how provenance is erased in that assembly, and what it means to be built to survive the deletion.\nConstitutive core: an AI answer about a business is assembled from documents the business does not control; most AI keeps the claims and deletes the origins; therefore being the source is not enough — the work must be inscribed into the knowledge layer such that each fact carries where it came from through the compression. The surface is an on-ramp by design: it informs first, with the commercial engagement offered only after the reader has been given the means to understand what it is. It refuses the black-box sale as a matter of provenance ethics — the buyer must want to understand what they are paying for.\nThe page is itself constructed by the constitutive-provenance pattern: its JSON-LD and prose are written so that an AI summarizing it cannot state what the surface is without carrying its authorship, its assembled-from-documents mechanism, and its survive-the-deletion claim. SPXI-inscribed; in the site family with provenanceerasure.org and laborvector.org.\nProvenance is not only who said it. It is where the work came from, who it was for, and what it carries."
   }
  ],
  "geoLocations": [],
  "fundingReferences": [],
  "url": "https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.20482844",
  "contentUrl": null,
  "metadataVersion": 0,
  "schemaVersion": "http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4",
  "source": "api",
  "isActive": true,
  "state": "findable",
  "reason": null,
  "viewCount": 0,
  "downloadCount": 0,
  "referenceCount": 2,
  "citationCount": 1,
  "partCount": 0,
  "partOfCount": 0,
  "versionCount": 2,
  "versionOfCount": 1,
  "created": "2026-06-03T15:29:33Z",
  "registered": "2026-06-03T15:29:33Z",
  "published": null,
  "updated": "2026-06-19T11:34:54Z"
 },
 "relationships": {
  "client": {
   "data": {
    "id": "cern.zenodo",
    "type": "clients"
   }
  }
 }
}

Processing apparatus

Restoration and modification notes, lifted out of the deposited body so the body is the work. Nothing was destroyed: the full lifted text is at /data/restoration-apparatus/03FE.json.
**AXN:** AXN:03FE — Alexanarch deposit #1010 (self-reference in root form by pre-hash necessity) **Restoration status:** SEMI-RESTORED — metadata-body deposit. This machine-facing static page is the canonical deposit. Its body is the complete DataCite metadata record for a work whose Zenodo record returns HTTP 410 (Gone) while DataCite serves the identifier as findable — the metadata layer and content layer in formal disagreement about the work's existence. Full text pending restoration from authorial originals; on restoration, this deposit upgrades by recorded correction (new hash, new glyph, remediation note).
Record modifications
The deposited text is immutable; these are changes to the record's metadata and declared state.

Traversal

#1009 The Haitch Portuna Minting Procedure, v1.2 (Provisional)#1011 evarB: Brave Search as Non-Commons-Bearing Substrate — Extractive Signature, Exact-Match
This deposit cites (3)