Wiki โ€บ #460

LOGOTIC PROGRAMMING MODULE 1.2 The Epistemic Ledger

Johannes Sigil ยท 2026-02-08 ยท deposit #460
AXN:0116.GOVERNANCE.๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ”€๐ŸชŸ๐Ÿชžโ™…๐ŸŒ•

Article

The Epistemic Ledger is Logotic Programming module 1.2. It extends the implementation bridge of v1.1 without altering the kernel operators, type ontology, or core operational semantics.

Its binding principle is: a system may improvise; it may not improvise unknowingly. Every claim generated under the specification must receive an internal epistemic mode. A0 is directly grounded in anchored documents; A1 is inferred from them; A2 is knowingly improvised or divergent; and A3 is an unresolved diagnostic state that must be resolved or withheld before ordinary terminal emission. The prohibition is not against invention but against invention falsely experienced as retrieval.

The module defines Anchoring Distance, a continuous measure of how far a claim lies from its nearest independent source support. It adds support-versus-contradiction margins so high apparent similarity cannot hide conflict, requires multiple source families for the strongest grounding class, distinguishes parse ambiguity from evidence scarcity, and records retrieval failures as errors rather than zero distance.

A claim-level pipeline extracts propositions, retrieves candidate anchors, scores support and contradiction, classifies mode, applies a criticality-sensitive gate, and writes the result to an internal ledger. High-stakes claims receive stricter anchoring pressure. ANCHOR_ASYMPTOTIC iteratively refines a claim toward source support but classifies persistent divergence as A2 rather than looping indefinitely.

The ledger is mandatory internally; external display of the mode is policy-dependent. This distinction allows creative or exploratory output while preserving a trace of what the system believed it was doing. In the LP series, v0.9 specifies semantically computable operations, v1.0 creates the executable language, v1.1 makes it implementable and measurable, and v1.2 gives the implementation claim-level epistemic self-knowledge.

Defines (38)

Backend consistency Baseline ER profiling Canon-Defining Conformance test vectors Contradiction detection Cost integration Deliberate omission vs. system error Embedding backend appendix Emergency exception Epistemic Load (EL) vs. Semantic Rent (SR) Expected execution FORBIDDEN as terminal emission Formal proofs Full toroidal operations Gate enforcement Geometric IDE HARD_BLOCK Independence weighting Inverse operators Leveraged strength Margin enforcement Max iterations cap Metadata Homomorphism Requirement NaN Handling Neurosymbolic integration Not forbidden Not required O_leg (Legitimate Opacity) Paragraph-level Proposition-level Ratchet Clause Compliance SOFT_BLOCK Safety constraint integration Sentence-level Somatic measurement Support margin constraint Threshold mapping to epistemic modes Trace linkage

Reference network

Referenced by 22 other entities in the archive. See the full Knowledge Graph for reference paths, or the primary record for the full deposit with reference details.